<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Systematic Dialectics on Redblades Anabaptist Church</title><link>https://redblades.church/contra/</link><description>Recent content in Systematic Dialectics on Redblades Anabaptist Church</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Redblades Anabaptist Church</copyright><atom:link href="https://redblades.church/contra/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Contra Constantinian Protestantism</title><link>https://redblades.church/contra/protestantism/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://redblades.church/contra/protestantism/</guid><description>&lt;div class="polemic-header"&gt;
 &lt;span class="polemic-audience"&gt;Written for the Protestant reader&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;p style="font-size:1.05rem;color:var(--text-muted);max-width:640px;"&gt;
 We are not opponents of the Reformation's central discovery, of the conviction that Scripture
 stands over every human institution, or of the evangelical's hard-won insistence that religion
 is a matter of the heart and not merely of inherited form. We are diagnosing why a Reformation
 that got the theology right has spent five centuries failing to build what that theology requires.
 The Architectonic is Protestant through and through, standing in the specific lineage of the
 Radical Reformation. This is the case that Protestantism, everywhere it did not become
 Anabaptist, has never finished the work it started.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Contra Eastern Orthodox</title><link>https://redblades.church/contra/eastern-orthodox/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://redblades.church/contra/eastern-orthodox/</guid><description>&lt;div class="polemic-header"&gt;
 &lt;span class="polemic-audience"&gt;Written for the Eastern Orthodox reader&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;p style="font-size:1.05rem;color:var(--text-muted);max-width:640px;"&gt;
 Eastern Orthodoxy is the most intellectually serious competitor the Redblades Architectonic
 faces. Not Catholicism — which shares Orthodoxy's structural deficiency but has less
 sophisticated philosophical armature. Not secular liberalism — which collapses too quickly
 under BTO's eliminative pressure. This document is written in the spirit of the highest
 compliment one intellectual can pay another: total honesty.
 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="polemic-concessions"&gt;
 &lt;span class="polemic-concessions__label"&gt;Three Concessions — Before We Begin&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;div class="polemic-concession"&gt;
 &lt;strong&gt;One:&lt;/strong&gt; Unconditional Eternal Security (OSAS) is false. The New Testament teaches
 Conditional Preservation. The Architectonic's TAAS theology agrees with Eastern Orthodoxy
 completely on this point.
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;div class="polemic-concession"&gt;
 &lt;strong&gt;Two:&lt;/strong&gt; The Magisterial Reformers made catastrophic errors. Calvin had Servetus
 burned. Luther had Anabaptists killed. The Constantinian settlement they retained produced
 Enlightenment liberalism. We agree with the Orthodox critique of them.
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;div class="polemic-concession"&gt;
 &lt;strong&gt;Three:&lt;/strong&gt; Generic tradition without a specific living community is useless.
 We are not defending abstract Protestant principles. We are defending a specific,
 historically-grounded tradition with 500 years of community life — the Anabaptist covenant
 community — and a complete theory of reality derived from first principles.
 &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="part-i-the-first-principles-grid"&gt;Part I: The First-Principles Grid&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eight fields of structural comparison. For the complete analysis, download the full document.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Contra Roman Catholicism</title><link>https://redblades.church/contra/roman-catholicism/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://redblades.church/contra/roman-catholicism/</guid><description>&lt;div class="polemic-header"&gt;
 &lt;span class="polemic-audience"&gt;Written for the Traditionalist Catholic reader&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;p style="font-size:1.05rem;color:var(--text-muted);max-width:640px;"&gt;
 We are not opponents of the Scholastic achievement, of the Roman liturgical inheritance,
 or of the intellectual seriousness of the Traditionalist Catholic who has looked honestly
 at the wreckage of the post-conciliar Church and refused to look away. We are opponents
 of specific metaphysical and institutional commitments that generate demonstrable incoherence
 — incoherence that, left unremedied, produces the very collapse the Traditionalist Catholic
 already mourns. This document is written in the spirit of the highest compliment one
 intellectual can pay another: total honesty.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>